[amsat-bb] SignalinkUSB and Linux
cwo4mann at comcast.net
Sat Jul 1 18:10:13 UTC 2017
Thanks for the tip about gPredict. I've been using it stand alone but now see the hooks for Rotor control, etc.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 1, 2017, at 11:21, Oliver Krystal <mr.soup12 at gmail.com> wrote:
> You're not that far off topic actually. Stuff that works in Ubuntu might work in Redhat (and vice versa).
> But I know Unbuntu 9.10 was different at the time then Fedora - RedHat was a big push for the horrors of systemctl, the network command stack was (and still is) different.
> Even so, there's been a big change since 2009 - systemctl among them.
> As I stated, my printer that once worked in Fedora 20 but I haven't been able to get it to work since 24 - it seems to be something in SELinux because turning it off enabled it to communicate with the printer but ... I said heck with it and spun a windows 7 vm with a shared folder.
> Things change. Oh well.
>> On 06/30/2017 10:41 PM, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>> On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 01:59:17 +0000
>> "Devin L. Ganger" <devin at thecabal.org> wrote:
>>> Not trying to nitpick, but I thought that Fedora (which I've never
>>> used, had already switched away from Red Hat Linux to Debian) was
>>> still based on the RPM packaged developed by Red Hat and Ubuntu (by
>>> Canonical) was a downstream variant of Debian, using Debian's package
>>> management format.
>> This is correct. Fedora and Ubuntu do not have a common ancestor other
>> than the fact that they both use the Linux kernel.
>> You can see here that Debian pre-dates RedHat by about a year:
>> For even more fun, here's a larger family tree:
>> Sorry to steer the list off topic.
>> 73 DE KD5RYO
>> - -- Happy Hacking!
>> GPG: 1200 0808 F968 47AB F489 91A3 FE26 6FFB 1A77 0868
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB