[amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1

Mike Rupprecht mail at mike-rupprecht.de
Wed Feb 15 14:27:41 PST 2012

See here - why ...


73 Mike

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] Im
Auftrag von Bruce Robertson
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012 21:55
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1

I just tried F and G. G was the better fit, with a 80+ deg. pass, it
held up pretty well against the doppler, though not perfectly.

73, Bruce

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Had a blast collecting telemetry for MaSat-1 just now. I used object
> C, which was not correct for doppler. Judging by the point at which
> the signal ended on my clear horizon, I think it might be
> F or G.
> For those who are new to the software, I'd note that the strongest
> signal on the waterfall is the one that should be aligned
> approximately with the 575 Hz mark. It is quite tolerant of your being
> off by a 100 Hz or so, I'd say. I also think that the CW signal should
> be on the 1200 Hz mark (i.e., don't tune the CW to a typical CW tone,
> which is around 600 Hz).
> Does anyone know how close to the upper and lower marks I can set my
> filter on the TS-2000?
> 73, Bruce
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com

Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list