[amsat-bb] Re: satellite antenna photos oa4o
Mike Seguin N1JEZ
n1jez at burlingtontelecom.net
Fri Dec 7 04:54:45 PST 2012
The 70 cm antenna could be Cushcraft, but I think the 2M is KLM because of
the configuration of driven elements. Folded dipole vs T match.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John / NS1Z" <ns1zjohn at gmail.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: satellite antenna photos oa4o
>I have a set of older Cushcraft antennas that meet that criteria: 738XB and
>22XB. Both have polarity switching but the 435 ant has the box on the rear.
>I have manuals for both.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Booth
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: satellite antenna photos oa4o
>> 2M looks like a KLM 22c with polarity switcher
>> 70 cm looks like a KLM 40cx with polarity switcher
>> 1.2 G looks like a Tonna (F9FT?) http://www.f9ft.com/indexe.html
> I agree with Mike, N1JEZ. The KLM's were the only one with the big box
> switcher on the end of the 440 boom. The 144 unit was not covered but an
> circuit board with lots of exposed phasing wires.
> In fact looks exactly like mine except mine have the F9FT in the middle of
> boom. If you need copies of the KLM manuals let me know .....
More information about the AMSAT-BB