[amsat-bb] Re: FO 29 help
morsesat at optonline.net
Sun Apr 24 07:33:54 PDT 2011
Sure do miss AO-40 (10 & 13 too!)
Accused of having my own agenda but I don't mind-seems to be the majority
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 6:42 PM
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FO 29 help
2 real good points.
I for one DON'T see what the big deal is about the FM birds other then being
Every time I listen it's like a free for all.
Sure do miss AO-40
AMSAT life member
At 04:44 PM 4/23/2011, you wrote:
>At 06:37 AM 4/24/2011, Kevin Deane wrote:
>> Or he could just use FM since hardly anyone uses the SSB birds
>> compared to the other sats.
>>Although I am sure there are a million reasons not to use FM. even
>>though it works just fine on the SSB birds. The feedback I got from
>>the FO-29 Control Team was that SSB was pretty much "the rule" or
>>"band plan" if you will.
>FM works, but it is STRONGLY discouraged for 2 reasons:
>1. It uses more of the transponder's bandwidth (meaning less users on
>2. It uses more transponder power, which is a serious consideration,
>given that many of our birds are getting old and the batteries are
>73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB