[amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements
arskm9u at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 04:37:02 PDT 2011
I just read the LOTW FAQ and it stated that the satellite name HO-68 is
supported by LOTW.
I have never been able to upload any logs containing HO-68 as the sat name.
TQSL 1.13 does not have HO-68 in the satellite drop-down menu box.
Is there something I'm missing?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb at wd9ewk.net>
To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 22:48
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements
> Hi Tom!
>> When I tried uploading a couple of my satellite QSOs as a test LOTW says
>> that the MODE field is invalid. I had entered "SAT". I know this has been
>> discussed in recent months here but I couldn't find that discusssion in
>> looking at the archives. Would someone put me on the right track as to
>> fields are required for a satellite QSO to be considered valid by LOTW?
> The MODE field refers to the transmission mode - FM, SSB, etc. The
> fields related to a satellite QSO are PROP_MODE (this is always set
> to "SAT") and SAT_NAME matches the names in the list at:
> I'm pretty sure Rick e-mailed you the PDF written by N5JB that shows
> the 7 fields that must be present for a valid satellite QSO in LOTW,
> including the two I mentioned above. Others can be added, but are
> optional. The document is found at:
> Hope to see some of our QSOs match up as QSLs in LOTW soon.
> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB