[sarex] Re: A letter to myself...
w5did at me.com
Thu Nov 26 16:05:54 PST 2009
That is definately a rumour. It simply hasn't Been decided yet. The
next project which is in the works is to make arrangements for power
for whatever is decided upon.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 26, 2009, at 17:58, Thomas Frey <th.frey at vtxmail.ch> wrote:
> Luc and Lou
> I "heard" that the ATV experiment, for which the L/S antennas was
> built, died
> concerning a discordancy of two ATV groups. The one liked to have
> analogue ATV,
> the other group liked to have DATV. But this could be a rumour.
> As you know, without informations there will rumours float around.
> Louis McFadin schrieb:
>> The ARISS VHF/UHF antennas were funded entirely by AMSAT-NA and
>> some volunteers. Would you you like to join the ranks of those who
>> contributed? If so you know how to contact Martha.
>> What are you implying here?
>> Of course you seemed to miss the part about the V and U antennas
>> and the "and volunteers" as opposed to the L& S antennas which
>> were a separate project conducted by the ARISS Europe team. The L&
>> S antennas were especially difficult since they had to withstand
>> the launch environment of the Shuttle payload bay. I think the
>> ARISS Europe team overcame very difficult obstacles including
>> technical and financial. They are to be commended for their work
>> and tenacity. The operative thing here is performance and
>> achievement rather than talk.
>> On Nov 26, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Luc Leblanc wrote:
>>> On 25 Nov 2009 at 23:50, Bob- W7LRD wrote:
>>> Date sent: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:50:37 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: Bob- W7LRD<w7lrd at comcast.net>
>>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Iceland!!
>>> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
>>>> Hello all AO-7 fans
>>>> I just recently worked Ari-TF3ARI. After several emails and a
>>>> few false starts we connected on old AO-7.
>>> The footprint from TF will cover most of the U.S.! Another good
>>> reason to get on old AO-7!
>>>> I'm sure he will eventually get to meet most of the "regulars".
>>>> 73 Bob W7LRD
>>>> Washington State AMSAT area coordinator
>>> Hi Bob
>>> i'm asking myself a couple of questions that i will share with you
>>> We can all deduct from your experience that a higher orbit
>>> increased the earth footprint. Adding more and more low orbit sat
>>> will not help
>>> any US continental operator to extend their contact zone beyond
>>> North America condemning them to continental QSO'S.
>>> When AMSAT-NA Says "We're Going Back to Space to add to the
>>> popular low-earth orbit FM transponder fleet" are they misleading
>>> membership or are they using the wrong words? as the definition of
>>> "popular" is something favoured by an individual or limited group
>>> not implies it is so popular for the vast majority of another group.
>>> If this "Going back to space" is only mean "allowing hams to
>>> continue to use their existing handheld and portable antenna
>>> regardless of their communication range. It should also be stated
>>> clearly. As it was written on the AMSAT-NA web page "This also
>>> the accessible entry path for new satellite operators to get
>>> started." it should also be clearly stated it will be not only an
>>> entry path but the only one path for them condemning them in an
>>> "entry class" forever when they are used to world-wide contacts on
>>> HF and
>>> or DSTAR.
>>> If the attraction pole is only focused on an entry class satellite
>>> and on the the replacement of the existing FM satellites fleet who
>>> starting to show their age. can we say it is a poor man choice?
>>> Yes it's fun to chase grids and roving along the roads making them
>>> available but fox hunting can be as rewarded too as geo caching
>>> is! What is the next step after the "entry class"? The void?
>>> Any short term vision can only lead to short term endeavour, it's
>>> a way to buy some time making by analogy a bunch of people playing
>>> their small backyard where there is only one 2 places swing set.
>>> It is a disaster recipe in a small backyard full of children
>>> more frustration than the playing benefits. Can we extend this
>>> analogy to this "Going back to space" IMHO a bad choice of words.
>>> Again it is only my own questioning triggered by an already
>>> existing world-wide class satellite project called P3E. There is
>>> no mention of
>>> it in this AMSAT-NA going back to space new deal as if they are in
>>> a closed shell or as they are shrinking on themselves. It is a
>>> sign of
>>> the time it is so nice in our lazy boy the easy way some will
>>> probably says the only one way depending of their state on mind
>>> and will.
>>> BAD WORDS CHOICES...
>>> Speaking of bad words choices what about the new Ham Antenna
>>> Installed on the ISS Columbus Module quote "Lou congratulated the
>>> team, "This
>>> is an example of what can be achieved by volunteer hams working
>>> closely with a space agency. This antenna project was funded
>>> entirely by
>>> That's fine but i remember sending some $$ in 2007 as donations
>>> where urgently Needed to Get ISS Columbus Module Amateur Radio-
>>> Ready. At
>>> the time they called for money quote "The total project cost is
>>> 80,000 Euros (approximately $106,500). Amateur Radio on the
>>> Space Station (ARISS) Vice Chairman Gaston Bertels, ON4WF, says a
>>> payment of 9000 Euros (approximately $12,000) is due this month.
>>> Europe remains 4000 Euros (approximately $5330) shy of that goal,
>>> however, and time is short to have it in place.
>>> You can read the whole article on: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/21/100/?nc=1
>>> A bank account was also open:
>>> "Bank Account Established
>>> AMSAT-Belgium has set up a bank account to receive donations
>>> toward equipping the module with the necessary ham radio antennas. "
>>> Is the money goes into the bit bucket? How someone representing
>>> ARISS can say "This antenna project was funded entirely by AMSAT-
>>> NA" An
>>> explanation is in order here by the writer or by some official in
>>> the ARISS group? Again it's not a question about misleading the
>>> but a question of basic plain honesty... ARISS is an international
>>> funded group if one of their members wants to get all the credit
>>> but a minimal amount of respect should not be mandatory to have a
>>> leading position at ARISS?
>>> I already wrote on the same subject but ARISS or AMSAT-NA remain
>>> strangely silent even if i posted the text on AMSAT-EU satellite
>>> group a
>>> loud silence remain on this subject. Could be some are sleeping on
>>> the switch could be this jolt will awaken them?
>>> In short WHERE MY MONEY GOES? the amateur satellite community is
>>> asking for money in a constant and quite aggressive way some times
>>> is it
>>> too much asking to know what they do with theses donations? as
>>> someone in US says only AMSAT-NA is paying for the antennas!!!
>>> Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
>>> Skype VE2DWE
>>> DSTAR urcall VE2DWE
>>> WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
>>> Sent via sarex at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
>>> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
>> Lou McFadin
>> ARISS US Hardware manager
>> Sent via sarex at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
> Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Best Regards, 73
> Thomas Frey, HB9SKA
> Thomas Frey, Holzgasse 2, CH-5242 Birr, Tel. + Fax: 056 444 93 41
More information about the SAREX