[sarex] Re: Lets go back to simplex voice
n2oeq at aceweb.com
Mon Aug 10 15:27:27 PDT 2009
I like can-do people. pat
>------- Original Message -------
>From : William M. Pasternak[mailto:newsline at ix.netcom.com]
>Sent : 8/10/2009 1:42:36 PM
>To : n2oeq at aceweb.com; sarex at amsat.org
>Subject : RE: [sarex] Re: Lets go back to simplex voice
>Its not going to happen. The simple way to explain it is that the
frequencies used by the ISS and the latter SAREX operations before it were
decided internationally and took several years to affect the
compromise. The frequencies as they exist make it possible for space
operations to co-exist with terrertrial operations in various parts of the
Also, as I recall, many of the astronaut and cosmonaut hams do not want to
work pile-ups. They operate ham radio as a leisure activity and are not DX
chasers. And there are some that have only an interest in communicating
with classrooms and do not otherwise operate.
Based on all of this the prospect of ISS operations returning to the era
single of frequency operations of the last century are little or none. I
kind of doubt that the pile-ups you and I recall will ever happen
again. The ARISS program is far to mature and structured for that.
At 09:17 AM 8/10/2009 -0700, Thomas McGrane wrote:
>Greetings from pat n2oeq, long island new york
>I never agreed with the use of different uplink frequencies for ISS
>phone operation. It only led to a lack of activity and simple
>regimented school contacts.
>I just tried calling the space station on two meters hoping they were
>listening but, as usual, no answer.
>We need a simple simplex frequency like years ago when the crew of the
>MIR or the ISS could just leave the radio on and answer as they pleased.
>Many times in the past, I called according to the tracking program and
>The old argument was that they wanted to operate split to avoid the
>confusion of a pileup. Well, I guess it worked because nobody talks any
>Please return to a simplex frequency so we can enjoy working the
>astronauts and cosmonauts again.
>People shouldnt avoid chaos, they should adapt and embrace it and learn
>to operate. Out of chaos comes order.
>I am extremely disappointed that the military has more say over these
>activities than the citizens who support both.
>Time to change please.
>War is easy and stupid, making peace is hard and productive.
>Thank you, pat.
>Sent via sarex at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
Sent via sarex at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
More information about the SAREX