[eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline

David Goncalves davegoncalves at gmail.com
Sat Sep 6 14:42:06 PDT 2008


Would it be far from the truth?

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Schultz <n8fgv at usa.net> wrote:

> Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium
> will
> send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well
> and
> truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
>
> Dan Schultz N8FGV
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:02:08 PM EDT
> From: "Frank Brickle" <brickle at pobox.com>
> To: "Daniel Schultz" <n8fgv at usa.net>Cc: eagle at amsat.org
> Subject: [eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
>
> > Dan --
> >
> > Understand that I mean nothing controversial by saying this, but it's
> very
> > unclear what the status of the Eagle and/or Intelsat projects *is*.
> There's
> > potentially a lot to say, but hard to know whether any of it is pertinent
> at
> > this point.
> >
> > I was prepared to deliver a paper on AMSAT-specific aspects of the same
> > topic (Delay Tolerant Networking) that I wrote up for DCC. The gist of
> the
> > paper was an outline of the specific implementation of a comprehensive
> > text-messaging service for Eagle. Given the current level of uncertainty
> > even about *who* the teams are, and the ambient level of acrimony in the
> > membership, it's questionable whether the time is worth spending.
> >
> > 73
> > Frank
> > AB2KT
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
> Eagle at amsat.org
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
>



-- 
David Goncalves
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://amsat.org/pipermail/eagle/attachments/20080906/ea4d0508/attachment.html


More information about the Eagle mailing list