[eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
davegoncalves at gmail.com
Sat Sep 6 14:42:06 PDT 2008
Would it be far from the truth?
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Schultz <n8fgv at usa.net> wrote:
> Failure to present papers or other evidence of progress at the symposium
> send a pretty clear message to the membership that these projects are well
> truly dead. Is that what we want to do?
> Dan Schultz N8FGV
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:02:08 PM EDT
> From: "Frank Brickle" <brickle at pobox.com>
> To: "Daniel Schultz" <n8fgv at usa.net>Cc: eagle at amsat.org
> Subject: [eagle] Re: 2008 Symposium deadline
> > Dan --
> > Understand that I mean nothing controversial by saying this, but it's
> > unclear what the status of the Eagle and/or Intelsat projects *is*.
> > potentially a lot to say, but hard to know whether any of it is pertinent
> > this point.
> > I was prepared to deliver a paper on AMSAT-specific aspects of the same
> > topic (Delay Tolerant Networking) that I wrote up for DCC. The gist of
> > paper was an outline of the specific implementation of a comprehensive
> > text-messaging service for Eagle. Given the current level of uncertainty
> > even about *who* the teams are, and the ambient level of acrimony in the
> > membership, it's questionable whether the time is worth spending.
> > 73
> > Frank
> > AB2KT
> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
> Eagle at amsat.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Eagle