[eagle] Re: YAHOO!!!! IT WORKS!!!!
juan-rivera at sbcglobal.net
Sun Sep 16 20:12:15 PDT 2007
Good point and another argument for top-level system engineering. There
should be network documentation showing address and priority assignments for
each payload. This should be a top-level function along with allocating the
amount of power each payload can consume. None of these global issues
should be left to the individual subsystem teams to determine.
Juan - WA6HTP
From: eagle-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:eagle-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 5:53 PM
To: Jim Sanford
Cc: Robert McGwier; eagle at amsat.org
Subject: [eagle] Re: YAHOO!!!! IT WORKS!!!!
The mode and address must be soldered onto the widget (jumper pads
provided on the widget for this purpose). It is assumed that the module
builder would do this. It's that assumption that should be documented.
I say this to bring up the follow-on issue.
The module builder chooses the mode.
The address should be specified by the system administrator since the
addresses must be unique for each module and the priority is a function
of the address. Module builders should give input to the system
administrator as to what they feel their priority should be, but
presumably only the system administrator is in a position to know the
priority requirements of *all* modules and is therefor in a position to
make these priority (address) decisions.
Jim Sanford wrote:
> There's a lesson here: DOCUMENTATION
> Juan expected/assumed one thing, the CAN-Do! widget was something
> else. Other teams will go through exactly the same issue. SO, it
> appears we need to add some documentation to each WIDGET in terms of
> serial number, address, and probably a handful of other things I don't
> know about.
> Let's learn from this experience.
> Juan, thanks to you and your team for perservering.
> Stephen, thanks for your prompt support on a short fuse.
> This kind of response and mutual support is exemplary, and what it
> will take to get Eagle on orbit.
> Thanks & very 73,
> wb4gcs at amsat.org
> Dave hartzell wrote:
>> Wow, this is a relief. I'm glad it was something simple....after all
>> the hunting and pecking we did yesterday, I'm glad it was something so
>> I guess when the term "bus" is used, an address as probably key to
>> getting to your destination. ;-)
>> On 9/16/07, Juan Rivera <juan-rivera at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> We need to take up a collection to buy Stephen a large hero badge. He
>>> the problem and the receiver is now sitting on my bench happily
>>> signal. The new CAN-Do module that he sent me had a different address
>>> the old one and the old files were addressing the initialization
>>> instructions to a non-existent device. All we have to do is change the
>>> address field in the initialization files and everything is fine.
>>> Whew! The train of life in back on the tracks!
>>> 73 to all,
>>> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
>>> Eagle at amsat.org
> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
> Eagle at amsat.org
Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
Eagle at amsat.org
More information about the Eagle