[eagle] Re: New 70 cm Receiver Test Results

Robert McGwier rwmcgwier at gmail.com
Sat Jun 9 07:03:47 PDT 2007


John B. Stephensen wrote:
> Since the noise is always symmetrical around the received signal, the 
> switcher noise must be modulating the VCO control voltages. There are 
> two switchers - one on the receiver PCB and one on the CAN-DO module. We 
> must determine which is causing the problem or whether both are. Can you 
> cut the trace on the PCB and vary the DC voltage to the receiver 
> independently of the voltage to the CAN-Do module?

I agree with this switcher comment and did as soon as I saw the picture. 
  I really hope this is not the CAN-DO module as FLIGHT UNITS have been 
DELIVERED for P3E.  We need to have Stephen, et. al. check the noise 
output of the switcher on the Can-Do module.


>  
> I hope that you can tap each component and find the microphionic one. 
> Good candidates for microphonic components are the capacitors in the PLL 
> feedback loop. The capacitors in the integrator are film types so they 
> shouldn't be microphonic but perhaps SMT parts aren't as good as leaded 
> parts. The ceramic capactors in the feedback path might also cause 
> problems and could be changed to film capacitors. Another 
> possibility may be the 4.7 and 10 uF bypass capacitors on the outputs of 
> the linear regulators. These are ceramic because of concerns about 
> tantalums in space but they might have good piezoelectric properties and 
> could be switched to 1206 size tantalum capacitors. There could also be 
> a cold solder joint somewhere.
>  
> 73,
>  
> John
> KD6OZH
> 

-- 
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair
"If you're going to be crazy, you have to get paid for it or
else you're going to be locked up." Hunter S. Thompson


More information about the Eagle mailing list