[eagle] Re: Eagle 10 MHz Clock
bill at hsmicrowave.com
Wed Apr 11 10:47:50 PDT 2007
Thanks for the clarification. I thought Tom was referring to the using
the "S/C" transponders for ranging - well I guess he would be using them.
My post below says "As you know John has already designed for operating
without the 10 MHz satellite clock and I'm also doing the same." so I'm
on the same page with you.
Regards...Bill - N6GHz
Rick Hambly (W2GPS) wrote:
> s/c means SpaceCraft.
> It is a waste of time to design for operation without the 10 MHz satellite
> oscillator (it is not a clock). The design will simply need to be redone. On
> the other hand, if designs incorporate their own soft fail options, so much
> the better.
> I expect a design for the 10MHz satellite reference based on a design Tom
> and I have seen that includes its own soft fail redundancy. I will discuss
> this possibility with Tom soon.
> AMSAT LM2232
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eagle-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:eagle-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of
> Bill Ress
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:17 PM
> To: K3IO at verizon.net
> Cc: EAGLE
> Subject: [eagle] Re: Eagle 10 MHz Clock
> Hi Tom,
> Thanks for your inputs.
> Do you have a time frame for your USO benefactor's commitment to the
> We're designing based on 10 MHz reference assumptions and that leaves
> me, at least, with an empty feeling. Since over 10 subsystems will use
> this reference, it would be great to get this block defined.
> As you know John has already designed for operating without the 10 MHz
> satellite clock and I'm also doing the same.
> Oh - - - help with out Tom. You used "s/c ranging" in you one of your
> recent posts. The "s/c" stands for what??? S and C transponders??
> Regards...Bill - N6GHz
> Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
>> Bill Ress wrote:
>>> If indeed the clock is used by all LO's it is important that the LO
>>> designers know the reference's characteristics so that synthesis schemes
>>> and loop bandwidths can be better defined.
>> Assume that it is a low noise crystal. Signals will come from an N-port
>> driver that is a part of the USO. A good standard level will be 0 dBm
>> into 50 ohms (although it could be a tad higher -- like up to 1V RMS =
>> +13 dBm if really needed).
>> I would suggest that each user system could use the precision reference
>> if it is available, but should switch over to an internal oscillator if
>> the precision source goes away. This is the way most counters, spectrum
>> analyzers, etc work and it permits a good, simple "fail soft" option.
>>> With that in mind, can you Tom, 1) determine what the specs of the
>>> $ystem USO might be (or point me to a place when I might deduce them),
>>> and 2) what's a realistic time frame for deciding if that $ugar
>>> daddy/mommy comes through with a commitment? We not only have to get a
>>> handle on the 10 MHz oscillator but the RF distribution circuitry after
>>> In regards to the RF distribution circuitry, I count 8 users of the 10
>>> Mhz clock. Help me out here if I missed one....
>>> 1) V Transmitter
>>> 2) U Receiver (maybe two?)
>>> 3) L Receivers (two)
>>> 4) S Transmitter
>>> 5) S2 Receiver
>>> 6) C Transmitter
>>> 7) IHU
>>> 8) Spare (for X or K beacon or a "contributing" customer)
>> As Lyle mentioned, all the DSP widgets need the reference signal also.
>> For precise ranging it is likely that some really tight special DSP code
>> will be loaded into the DSP engines for maximum accuracy. This will be
>> to ensure the flattest possible phase response thru the system (the
>> group delay tau is measured as d(phase)/d(freq) over the however wide
>> the passband can be).
>> Thinking of obtaining the best possible accuracy, we may want to do U/V
>> and a microwave pair simultaneously to provide a calibration of the
>> ionosphere; the one-way group delay thru the ionosphere varies as 1/f²
>> and has a magnitude ~2M at S-band.
>> 73, Tom
> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
> Eagle at amsat.org
More information about the Eagle