[eagle] Re: A wild thought

[Jim Sanford]

Lou:
Good comment, but:  My thinking is that the design materials should be 
sufficiently self-explanatory to the qualified team member that this 
won't be a problem.  If it is, either the documents aren't good enough, 
or the individual isn't qualified.  I expect very little additional 
effort.  If events prove me wrong, we'll review the bidding.

Thanks & 73,
jim
wb4gcs at amsat.org


Louis McFadin wrote:

> The concern that I have is that we end up spending an inordinate 
> amount of time and resources bring people up to speed. As you know 
> that can completely disrupt the process.
> If you want to bring in additional people I suggest you bring them in 
> sooner rather than later.
>
> Lou McFadin
>
> W5DID
>
> w5did at mac.com <mailto:w5did at mac.com>
>
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Jim Sanford wrote:
>
>> Bob:
>> I agree.  And the issue you raise is a BIG one.  I have seen good design 
>> reviews turn into a complete waste due simply to having too many 
>> qualified people involved in one evolustion at the same time.
>> thanks & 73,
>> J
>> im
>>
>>
>> Robert McGwier wrote:
>>
>>> I completely believe in openness.  There has been some grumbling about 
>>> the small peer review groups but this has more to do with unwieldy 
>>> meetings on these low bandwidth VoIP tools we are using than it does 
>>> with secrecy.  I support this completely.  I also suggest that we have 
>>> an official scribe at each peer review to take down detailed notes of 
>>> our peer review sessions to post on  EaglePedia.  Again,  the size is 
>>> about efficiency, not closedness.  We would welcome comments from all.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Sanford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Team:
>>>> I've been thinking about this for a while.  Recent publicity for 
>>>> Eagle in multiple publications has resurrected the thought, so I seek 
>>>> your comments.
>>>>
>>>> I'm considering seeking, for each discrete peer review, an additional 
>>>> review team member from AMSAT membership at large.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
>> Eagle at amsat.org <mailto:Eagle at amsat.org>
>> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle
>
>