[eagle] Re: A wild thought
wb4gcs at amsat.org
Tue Jan 2 18:35:26 PST 2007
I agree. And the issue you raise is a BIG one. I have seen good design
reviews turn into a complete waste due simply to having too many
qualified people involved in one evolustion at the same time.
thanks & 73,
Robert McGwier wrote:
> I completely believe in openness. There has been some grumbling about
> the small peer review groups but this has more to do with unwieldy
> meetings on these low bandwidth VoIP tools we are using than it does
> with secrecy. I support this completely. I also suggest that we have
> an official scribe at each peer review to take down detailed notes of
> our peer review sessions to post on EaglePedia. Again, the size is
> about efficiency, not closedness. We would welcome comments from all.
> Jim Sanford wrote:
>> I've been thinking about this for a while. Recent publicity for
>> Eagle in multiple publications has resurrected the thought, so I seek
>> your comments.
>> I'm considering seeking, for each discrete peer review, an additional
>> review team member from AMSAT membership at large.
More information about the Eagle