[amsat-florida] Re: [amsat-bb] FCC 70cm Proposal
w5did at mac.com
Wed Apr 15 08:51:48 PDT 2009
I don't believe relaxing is a good idea. Constant vigilance by all is
the mantra to have. I am worried about getting sued for causing
someone to have some reaction to my 70CM signal I send up to AO51 or
other satellite or talking to the local repeater. Someone who I have
no knowledge of.
We should ask them to stay away from the 70 cm ham band. 400Mhz is OK
as long as they can accept signals from 420 + without harm.
I would think something that has health consequences would receive a
lot of careful safety analysis before being made operational.
On Apr 15, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Graham Shirville wrote:
> A further check with an expert gives me this response:
> "No protection at all - at least in Europe. Short Range Devices must
> cause interference and must suffer any interference they receive.
> don't like that, but it's in the Short range Device Directive. Not
> Ofcom pay any attention to it if they can avoid doing so. Even Part
> 95 MICS
> devcies in the US get no protection, and that applies every where
> so perhaps we can relax?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville at btinternet.com>
> To: "Keith N4ZQ" <n4zq at netzero.com>; <amsat-bb at amsat.org>;
> <amsat-florida at amsat.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FCC 70cm Proposal
>> Hi All,
>> From another group I read that the maximum power radiated outside
>> the body
>> will be around -30 to -40dBm, so not much chance of these systems
>> being a
>> problem to us.
>> But of course if they expect "protection" from our signals....
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Keith N4ZQ" <n4zq at netzero.com>
>> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>; <amsat-florida at amsat.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:18 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] FCC 70cm Proposal
>>> This is interesting.... N4ZQ
>>> FCC Proposes to Allocate 20 MHz of Spectrum in 413-456 MHz Band For
>>> Implanted Neuromuscular Devices
>>> The FCC has released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM - ET
>>> 09-36) seeking comment on a proposal to allocate 20 MHz of
>>> spectrum in
>>> the 413-457 MHz band for use by wireless medical devices that
>>> could be
>>> implanted into the human body and used to restore sensation and
>>> mobility to paralyzed limbs and organs. The devices would act as a
>>> wireless medical micro-power network (MMN) within the patient.
>>> the conditions that could be treatable using MMNs include polio, ALS
>>> (Lou Gehrig's disease), cerebral palsy, and spinal cord injuries.
>>> The 400 MHz band is targeted because it is optimal for RF
>>> through body tissue. The devices would require at least 5 MHz of
>>> bandwidth to function and would operate on a low power, secondary
>>> interference basis. Twenty MHz of spectrum in four band segments
>>> proposed so that the device would have four options in case one band
>>> segment was already in use in a given area. The NPRM seeks comment
>>> the feasibility of four different band segments:
>>> * 413-419 MHz
>>> * 426-432 MHz
>>> * 438-444 MHz
>>> * 451-457 MHz
>>> Comment is also sought on:
>>> * Potential for interference between MMNs and incumbent users
>>> * Service rules (licensed or unlicensed, definitions, permissible
>>> communications, eligibility, etc.)
>>> * Technical rules (power limitations, bandwidth, frequency
>>> channelization, antenna locations, etc.)
>>> The text of the News Release is available at:
>>> Learning Centers - Click Here.
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> Via the AMSAT-Florida mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
> AMSAT-Florida at amsat.org
w5did at mac.com
More information about the AMSAT-Florida