[amsat-bb] Crossed polarity dual band single feed yagi
Rico van Genugten
rico.van.genugten at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 15:24:59 UTC 2016
With an open-sleeve configuration as you have the distance between vhf and
uhf elements is fixed, so you can either get true circular polarisation
either on VHF or UHF, by spacing the two perpendicular antennes either with
1/4 wl on VHF or 1/4 wl on UHF respectively. The other will have arbitrary
In your images you only show 'total' gain, which is a summation of vertical
and horizontal afaik. Using the < and > keys you can switch to hortizontal,
vertical, lhcp or rhcp, those are more informative in this case.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Pedro via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Hi Rico,
> Thank you for that explanation.
> The main problem here is that the original antenna has the UHF elements
> just to help the VHF tune into UHF. It's not a true dual feed VHF/UHF.
> So if I get this concept in circular polarisation it'll always be for the
> VHF leaving UHF to the mercy of a low gain.
> The simulation confirms that the gain will bend into an elliptical
> polarisation, but not that significant.
> It's tricky alright.
> Here are the calculations from 4nec2.
> 73s Pedro
> Quoting Rico van Genugten <rico.van.genugten at gmail.com>:
> Hi Pedro,
>> I have thought about this subject a lot. How to build an antenna that is
>> single boom, dual band, circularly polarized. I have come to the
>> that it is pretty difficult due to the following considerations:
>> - To create a circularly polarized antenna a phase shift of 1/4 wl is
>> needed. A phase shift can be obtained through physical distance on the
>> boom, or a difference in feed line length.
>> - When a phase shift of 0 is produced, for instance when the elements are
>> on the same location on the boom and there is no feed line difference, you
>> will end up with a diagonal linear polarized antenna. Think about it: You
>> have two perpendicular linear antennas in the same plane, the resultant
>> will be the summation of the two antennes: a diagonal antenna.
>> - When a phase shift of anything in between 0 and 1/4 wl (or any multiple)
>> is produced, the antenna polarization is somewhere between linear and
>> circular: it will be elliptically polarized. This will mean that it is not
>> completely deaf in one plane like a linear antenna, but will have a gain
>> optimum in a particular plane and a gain minimum in a plane perpendicular
>> to it.
>> - 1/4 wl spacing on UHF is (obviously) not the same as 1/4 wl spacing on
>> VHF, but if you use open-sleeve feeding (2 feed points) there is no way to
>> manipulate either the position on the boom or the feed line difference for
>> VHF and UHF independently
>> - If you use 4 feed points you have full control of the placing of the
>> antennas on the boom and the feed line differences and are probably able
>> produce a true single boom, dual band, circularly polarized antenna, but
>> the VHF and UHF antennas will influence each other so strongly that you
>> will probably end up placing the UHF antenna after the last element of the
>> VHF antenna, leaving you with either a very long boom or very little gain.
>> My two cents. :)
>> 73, Rico
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Pedro via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
>> Hi all,
>>> The best of ham radio is that you can build and experiment.
>>> My current portable yagi is a dualband single fed (VHF element) home
>>> built, from DK7ZB designs, 4+5 elements version. VHF has 9.25dB gain
>>> 1.03SWR, UHF 8.67dB 1.12SWR.
>>> It works like a charm.
>>> Now that I'm on the final stages of condo permits for a tower - although
>>> it's a tower on top of the building there are still space limitations -
>>> goal is to build a crossed polarity set of my portable antenna. Something
>>> similar to what Gulf Alpha had, but instead of 4 feed points, one for
>>> band/polarisation, I'll have only two, combined into one impedance
>>> feed line to the shack.
>>> Due to the required materials for the feed points and the elements
>>> positions I came up with 2 versions where the vertical antenna is ahead
>>> the horizontal by 3 inches and 16 inches. My understanding is that
>>> polarisation would require a specific position for the vertical antenna
>>> plus the proper cable circuit for it.
>>> I'm aware that RHCP would give me a stable signal reception, rather than
>>> my setup even tilted 45 degrees instead of plain horizontal/vertical. I
>>> PU3GUO report on his VHF only antenna while receiving ANDE.
>>> I've ran the model in 4nec2 for the two options, 145MHz and 435MHz, and
>>> using 5W. Here are my findings.
>>> 3 inches separation:
>>> Both antennas 1.03SWR
>>> Combined gain 9.25dB
>>> Both antennas 1.12SWR
>>> Combined gain 8.67dB
>>> 16 inches separation:
>>> Both antennas 1.03SWR
>>> Combined gain 9.24dB
>>> Horizontal antenna 1.12SWR; Vertical antenna 1.49SWR
>>> Combined gain 8.27dB
>>> My conclusion is that advancing the vertical antenna by so many inches
>>> will result in interference from the horizontal one in such way that the
>>> gain is lower and SWR increases.
>>> Gain in UHF is lower, expected as same happens in my current portable
>>> antenna, and that's because it's being fed in the VHF element.
>>> Has anyone built something similar that can share any comments?
>>> Would there be any other configuration possible for a single boom?
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>> 73s de Pedro
>>> CU2ZG, HM77
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB