[amsat-bb] Update on FunCube-3 / EO-79 Interference
wouterweg at gmail.com
Mon Nov 14 19:18:38 UTC 2016
Dani, you are right.
What you are seeing is the combination of the attack and decay time of
the AGC with a strong signal.
You can see the AGC bringing the noise back up as soon as the carrier is gone.
The transponder is fast-attack and slow decay on the AGC.
Since the downlink passband is a bit stronger as compared to
FUNcube-1, you can now more clearly see the passband.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Dani EA4GPZ <daniel at destevez.net> wrote:
> El 13/11/16 a las 17:55, Scott escribió:
>> I have uploaded a screen shot of my waterfall showing how the wideband
>> stream comes & goes in response to activation of the transponder at:
> Hi Scott,
> I think that what you're seeing is just the noise floor of the
> transponder. I have no experience with FUNcube-3, but your picture looks
> very much like the noise floor I have seen on FUNcube-1. On overhead
> passes, it's quiet noticeable, even with only a 3 element yagi.
> Keep in mind that (usually) a linear transponder is running all the
> time. It doesn't have to be activated by an uplink signal.
> In general, AGC action may cause the transponder's noise floor to vary
> with input signals. One expects that if there are strong signals the
> transponder's noise floor will become weaker. This behaviour depends on
> lots of design parameters, so this need not always be the case.
> Dani EA4GPZ.
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB