[amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D
wa4sca at gmail.com
Sun Apr 13 13:18:05 PDT 2014
I ask about that yearly at Dayton. The answers, when not blank expressions, are along the lines of
"Satellite operators already know this, and are a tiny fraction of our market compared to APRS."
Obviously my suggestion that adding the phrase "Full Duplex Satellite Capable" might increase that
fraction has fallen on deaf ears.
<From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org
<[mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer
<Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:15 PM
<To: Mike Murphree
<Cc: Clint Bradford; amsat-bb at amsat.org
<Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D
<No idea why it's not in the literature, but it definitely is
<just like the earlier models of the D7 series.
<On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Mike Murphree <mike at tropo.org> wrote:
<> On Saturday, April 12, 2014, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> wrote:
<>> Just the Kenwood TH-D72A.
<>> Paul, N8HM
<> If the Kenwood is full-duplex, why don't they claim that
<anywhere in their
<> Mike N4MHO
<Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
<Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB