[amsat-bb] Re: 22% votes
johnag9d at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 15:13:01 PDT 2012
The reason for my thinking is simple. I was 10 when Gene Cernan walked on
the moon. In case you forgot, he was the LAST an to walk on the moon. I've
been waiting 38 years for it to happpen again. So rather then wait for P3E
or AO-40 part deux I would rather have something up there than nothing at
John - AG9D
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:09 PM, John Spasojevich <johnag9d at gmail.com>wrote:
> The way I understand this age old train of thought and I get it a lot from
> my local hams when I do a hamfest for AMSAT in my area is that, just like
> in many ham clubs, there are a group of people who feel that they are "real
> hams". Whether it's because they had to pass a harder test ( as in the old
> advanced test was harder then the current extra ) of they had to pass a 20
> WPM code test or they had to drive to the FCC and that people coming into
> the hobby today are second class citizens, not good enough because the test
> criteria changed. Same thing with AMSAT. Unless you work linear birds you
> are not a "real" satellite operator. We can take that a step or two
> farther. I'd say you are not a real satellite operator unless you use the
> old Oscar Locator, figure your own pass predictions without the benefit of
> a computer. We can make the argument of who is a better man all day long
> and still end up with the same two groups on opposite sides of the room.
> No doubt a HEO bird or geosync is idea, we've read it here a million times.
> We've heard the "build it and they will come" comments a million times. No
> one ever talks about the reality. Most of you guys who want HEO admit that
> you don't support AMSAT in it's current mission. So I assume you don't go
> to symposiums or have other routes to information. How much did AO40 cost
> in it's day? That part I don't know. I recall a slide from the 2010
> Symposium I think it was that showed the cost of a replacement AO-51 and it
> was around $500K, the price IntelSat wanted just to place a transponder on
> the open space of their bird and carry it to geosync was $1.2M. So how
> long will it take all of you "build it and they will come" guys to pony up
> that kind of money? Then there is a launch...visit www.batc.tv and watch
> AMSAT-DL's 2012 symposium update. P3E is sitting almost ready to go, the
> hardware is nearly 5 years old...there is no launch...no one can
> realistically raise that much money. If you have noticed there is not
> really that much development of new launchers so no opportunities to ride
> as ballast like in the old days.
> If you are going to push education, it's not real easy to sell someone
> like NASA who has launchers available, that their interest in education is
> served by launching an AO-40 replacement when it'll be full of "real hams"
> and little opportunity for students. The road to reduced cost launches lies
> with the education card and that is the path AMSAT-NA is on and until one
> of the "real hams" wants to step up and head a drive to raise several
> million dollars, I think you'll all be dead a buried before another AO-40
> John - AG9D
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:49 PM, John Becker <w0jab at big-river.net> wrote:
>> I sent this direct first but was rejected because I'm not on his
>> I really think that there are a large number like myself waiting to
>> see what is going to happen for a replacement for AO40.
>> From people that I have talked to with a license calls above tech
>> and more then a HT could care less about another FM bird.
>> At 03:47 PM 9/18/2012, you wrote:
>> >I disagree with the principle of prodding apathetic people to vote. If
>> somebody isn't willing to do the research, fill out a card, and mail it
>> back, then why should we go out of our way to get a vote they themselves
>> apparently don't care about. I'm more interested in the opinions of those
>> who are motivated enough to do this relatively simple task. I don't
>> understand the fixation with getting a higher percentage of the membership
>> to vote.
>> >73, Ken N2WWD
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB