[amsat-bb] Re: SMA connectors
ko6th.greg at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 20:51:50 PST 2012
Another $.02 from this neck of the woods...
BNC connectors may generally be more robust than SMA, but BNCs are not
totally free from problems. The center pin on my Alinco DJ-580 cracked
away from the wire going to the PC board, and the cylinder came loose on
its mounting (allowing it to twist), both of which required a deep dive
through three layers of PC board for the repair.
On the other hand, I've never had a problem with the SMA connectors on
my TH-F6A or D-7AG, which I variously use the original SMA antenna, an
extended after-market version, or a non-supported BNC adapter with my
Diamond RH-77B. I am aware that SMAs wear out, so I try not to change
them often, however.
Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote:
> Hi, (name/call?)!
>> My two cents worth- using an SMA to BNC adaptor does not address the
>> mechanical problem of an antenna or a coax flexing the SMA chassis connector-
>> especially the plastic HTs- I had to do a number on my VX5 which is a metal
>> case HT.
> The original two-part SMA-to-BNC adapters had no plastic/rubber
> cushions to help lessen the stress on the SMA connector. There
> has been an adapter made by KC2BHO for some time, and now
> the Diamond adapter I referenced earlier, that have something
> to help with that. Putting the large AL-800 telescoping whip on
> these HTs, even with the better SMA-to-BNC adapters, is probably
> not wise.
> For the typical duckie antennas, smaller telescoping whips, or
> coax - these newer adapters are adequate for most hams. It is
> still possible to put too much stress on the SMA connector with
> this adapter and whatever is connected to the adapter.
More information about the AMSAT-BB