[amsat-bb] Re: Geostationary Satellites
orbitjet at hotmail.com
Mon Oct 10 20:53:23 PDT 2011
There are "radio" considerations and then there are "traffic" considerations as well...
The odds of amateur radio getting a dedicated geo bird in the belt are next to nothing. a "drifter" (one above or below the belt) is more possible...and it is a good orbit for hamsats...Robert G. Oler WB5MZO ARRL AMSAT NARS life member
> From: kb5mu at amsat.org
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:59:43 -0700
> To: n2wwd at mindspring.com
> CC: AMSAT-BB at amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Geostationary Satellites
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Ken Ernandes wrote:
> > 1. There are a finite number of orbital slots at Geostationary. That is essentially like water front property.
> I've heard that asserted before, but I question the reasoning.
> My understanding is that spacing of satellites around the geostationary orbit is dictated by the beamwidth of the ground station antennas. In other words, it's a matter of spatial frequency sharing. The satellites have to be far enough apart that a ground station antenna can illuminate one of them without causing too much harmful interference to the ones in the adjacent slots, after all the expected errors (orbital and ground station pointing) are taken into account.
> If that's correct, since amateur radio satellite operate on different frequencies from the commercial satellites, there is no conflict between amateur radio satellites and commercial satellites for orbital slots.
> Where have I gone wrong?
> 73 -Paul
> kb5mu at amsat.org
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB