[amsat-bb] Re: Geostationary Satellites
vk3jed at gmail.com
Mon Oct 10 15:57:01 PDT 2011
At 08:51 AM 10/11/2011, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
>Just a novice guess here, but aren't the geostationary orbits MUCH
>higher than our satellites run? And therefore cost a lot more to
>get boosted to that orbit?
Got it in one, that's the main reason we don't have any geostationary
ham satellites, along with the need to have 3 for global coverage.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
More information about the AMSAT-BB