[amsat-bb] Re: reply from arrl on new vucc fees
k7trkradio at charter.net
Tue Jan 25 13:53:57 PST 2011
Excellent comment, Bob.
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Herrell
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 7:07 PM
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: reply from arrl on new vucc fees
From what I read from Bill Moore's post, the ARRL has got their last
penny out of me. Charging per QSO is absurd, especially if you have
already had your cards checked by a ARRL Card Checker.
_Eg: If someone has a first time ever Satellite VUCC with 250 QSOs the
$7.00 for the application
$50.00 for 250 QSOs @ $0.20 each
$12.00 for the certificate
$1.00 for paperwork/sticker return
His total would be $70.00_
I find that totally unacceptable. Yes, I know awards are getting
expensive, but I think the ARRL is getting a bit GREEDY.
I think I will continue working for the AMSAT Awards and forget about
the rest. I agree, AMSAT needs to have an AMSAT WAS and AMSAT VUCC
Award. My ARRL Satellite VUCC came with the word "Satellite" typed on
the certificate. Whatever happened to the term "OSCAR WAS" or "OSCAR VUCC"?
Sorry to rant, but I am getting feed up with the antics of the ARRL. And
yes, I am a member. It's time to let your ARRL Leadership know your
Bob Herrell AJ5C
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB