[amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question
Gary "Joe" Mayfield
gary_mayfield at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 20 20:38:08 PST 2011
If your approach is wrong that makes two of us :-) Last I checked no
SO-67 -- I have no idea why!
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:21 PM
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] restating LOTW question
Thanks to those who have responded to my post when I made my
first uploads to LOTW. I had asked about what "mode" I should
use when uploading AO-16 QSOs, since that is a cross-mode
satellite (that's how I worked it - FM up, SSB down). I have
heard about what to set the BAND field, and N5JB's document
makes it pretty clear that you use the band you transmit on
for that field. I am not uploading fields beyond the 7
necessary to make a valid LOTW QSO record, so other fields
like FREQ and FREQ_RX don't matter.
My guess is that, if I follow the way the BAND field is
handled for satellite QSOs in LOTW, I would use the mode I
transmitted with for the MODE field. In the case of AO-16,
that would be FM. N5JB's document mentions an additional
field BAND_RX that some may use. I have not seen any mention
of a "MODE_RX" field, but I will go with "MODE" as the mode
from my transmitter unless I get some authoritative information
to the contrary.
I will proceed to uploading CJ7EWK QSOs from November 2008,
and try to get all of my July 2010 VA7EWK QSOs - including
those at the Canada/USA border - done tonight. Then the huge
task of the WD9EWK QSOs.
By the way, is SO-67 still a no-go in LOTW?
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB