[amsat-bb] Re: AO-27 vs. TS-2000
Rick - WA4NVM
wa4nvm at comcast.net
Thu Feb 24 07:43:51 PST 2011
I had the same problem, so never worked AO-27 and SO-50 years ago. Then
I took your approach, hooked up my IC-706MkIIG as the receiver, problem
solved. So then installed an antenna switch to move the 440 antenna between
the Kenwood and Icom. I programmed 145.850 in a memory for transmit
and move the Icom vfo manually to track the downlink. I never change the
transmit frequency and use the computer program for antenna position only.
Your mobile rig should work just fine on the downlink if you don't have a
long coax run. I might add, I do have a preamp at my antenna also, like
I use the TS-2000 "solo" for all other satellites.
> Looking for some advice, please
> Tried real hard to work AO27 on an 80 degree + pass this afternoon, using
> the TS 2000 in Sat Mode. No good results because of the 'birdies' inherent
> in the radio. (tried the narrow FM deal - no luck). As I look at Page 103
> of the TS2000 manual I see that while using the main VFO at 436.799 that
> there is no rx possible. Since AO27's down link is at 436.795, it seems
> the 'birdie issue' is on the 440 side of the TS-2000.
> So, what I thought I would try on those 80+degree passes over me, is to
> a 2m/440 mobile rig on RX (with a dual band vertical realizing that the
> vertical is not optimum)l) and use the TS-2000 for Doppler TX. I can
> the mobile like the Clint HT step Doppler deal. This is all temporary but
> I'm so sick of AO51, I would like to try for some new grids. Need about 30
> for VUCC.
> Any TS2000 wizards out there would be appreciated
> 73, Ted
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB