[amsat-bb] Re: Fw: Stop flaming please

Roger Rogerkola at aol.com
Sat Dec 3 21:49:27 PST 2011


I don't think that it is appropriate language or a civil response. The 
author should be moderated.

Roger
WA1KAT

On 12/3/2011 2:26 PM, andy thomas wrote:
> I don't think this is the spirit of informed and reasonable debate.
>   
> 73 de andy g0sfj
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: Kevin Deane<summit496 at live.com>
> To: andythomasmail at yahoo.co.uk
> Sent: Saturday, 3 December 2011, 19:15
> Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Stop flaming please
>
>
> shut the fuck up dumbass, there will be nobody there on FM
>
>
> Kevin
> KF7MYK
>
>
>   
> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:35:10 +0000
> From: andythomasmail at yahoo.co.uk
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Stop flaming please
>
> I don't see why someone can't make a suggestion about a qrp experiment without being flamed about being incompetent, inadequate,  financially poor or in some other way a lesser member of the -bb. You guys ought to learn a little more tolerance.
>   
> Fact #1 is, ao-51 is dead and we don't have anything else of that quality for all of those operators who like doing field operations with an arrow. SO-50 is at best unpredictable and AO27 is not always on, depends on its ssp. Fact #2 is that anyone who is an alligator could have taken over vo-52 and didn't, thankfully. Fact #3 is that nobody would without seeking permission.
>   
> So please cut back from the snide clever-clever remarks about having too small a piece of kit, hi. I don't feel bad about raising the idea.
>   
> 73 de andy g0sfj
> _______________________________________________


More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list