[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100

Dee morsesat at optonline.net
Tue May 18 12:30:42 PDT 2010

Satellite enthusiasts,
To give everyone the actual Pre-release specs, I have attached the copy
(specs only) of the Icom pamphlet I was offered at Dayton about the IC9100.
I think that if Yaesu comes in with a $2000 version, they will corner the
market-  I own 2 (yes, two) IC910's and love them but the price of this
IC9100 is out there with the satellites somewhere.  The estimated cost of
$4000 is out of reach for the average satellite enthusiast.  This is a
hobby, not a profession...and while it looks great, the satellite users need
something they can afford so they can also donate to & support a Launch fund
to allow AMSAT-NA to put up another HEO bird. (One of the top questions to
AMSAT at the Dayton 2010 booth while spending 14+ hours assisting with fund
raising & fielding members questions.) Similar obstacles are being
encountered by AMSAT-DL. Putting together a satellite our members have asked
for is within sight, however, launching them is presently out of reach.
AMSAT-NA is presently putting together several LEO projects to keep the
spark alive. 
Icom, Yaesu, Kenwood, Alinco, & other manufacturers, a campaign for the
launch costs for the benefit of all is needed to re-kindle the satellite
spirit of yesterday. (AO-10, AO-13 and AO-40) DARA has started in this
direction with their matching funds offer(Thanks).  Let's continue with this
support. See you on the birds.
Dee, NB2F
AMSAT Life member and Satellite enthusiast

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of tosca005 at umn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:00 PM
To: Edward R Cole
Cc: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100

On May 17 2010, Edward R Cole wrote:

>At 02:38 PM 5/17/2010, tosca005 at umn.edu wrote:
>>Here's a thought: buy two SoftRocks for a lot less than the price of 
>>the Flex 5000 -- one would be the v6.3Rx/Tx and the other could be the 
>>V9 Rx  only.
>Huh? Why?  Put a xvtr for the uplink band on the Tx and another xvtr 
>for the downlink for the Rx.

Because the SoftRock v6.3Rx/Tx is half-duplex only. It receives OR it
transmits, but doesn't do both at the same time. So my proposal is that an
Rx/Tx unit provides the transmit, and a completely separate Rx only model
provides the receive.

>>, and use two coaxial relays to route the 28 MHz SoftRock IF Rx and Tx 
>>separately to the correct receive and transmit transverters.
>I thought you had two separate Softrocks, so why the relays?

Not an Rx/Tx relay. What I was imagining (and similar to what I am building
myself) uses a single pole, 6-position coaxial SMA relay. For satellite use
(full-duplex), the Tx port goes to the common, and the Tx port of 6
different transverters go onto the six selectable ports. The Rx port goes to
a second 6-way relay common, and the six poles go to the Rx side of 6
different bands.

Six-pole relays are hard to find, you might find it easier to come up with
4- pole relays, but I snatched up a bunch of six-pole relays from eBay a few
years back. In fact, i snatched up twice as many as I really wanted at the
time, because my regular auction looked to be in jeopardy of losing, so I
bid on a Buy-it-now auction, and of course, won both.

Four-pole relays would be plenty for V, U, L, and S bands in all legal

In my application for terrestrial use, one 6-pole relay goes to a 10M SDR
common, and the 6 poles go to (1) HF, (2) 50 MHz Xvt, (3) 144 MHz Xvt, (4)
222 MHz Xvt, (5) 432 MHz Xvt, (6) to a special 2M-10M intermediate Xvt,
which goes to another 6-pole relay, and from there to the 6 higher bands: 
902, 1296, 2304, 3456, 5760, and 10368 that all need a 2M IF instead of a
10M IF.

>>  A bit of innovation/homebrewing would be needed for convenient 
>>band-switching, since you would need to switch two different  
>>transverters into the correct "position" depending on the mode: V/U vs.
>> U/V
>>vs. V/S vs. U/S vs. L/S vs. L/U vs. whatever other modes you wanted to 
>>support. But 4 transverters (145, 435, 1269, and 2400 MHz) would give 
>>you lots of satellite modes.
>four xvtrs would give you every conceivable combination of up and down 
>link: V/U, U/V, V/L*, L/V, V/S, S/V, U/L*, L/U, U/S, S/U, L/S, S/L*
>* These modes are not allowed for Amateur Radio space-coms.
>If each xvtr was configured for separate Rx and Tx antenna and IF 
>connections the configuration tree would be simpler.  I count nine 
>configurations (excluding HF bands).
>If eighteen coax relays seem a bit much, make a coax patch panel and 
>use coax jumpers to configure for the mode you want.

One 4-pole relay for the Tx side, and one 4-pole relay for the Rx side
(well, you only need 3-pole since L-band is not an acceptable downlink) and
two rotary switches to select the Rx band and the Tx band would do it. But
wouldn't you prefer to be able to just push a button labelled "L/S" and have
the Tx and Rx relays switched to the appropriate band positions? 
That's what I ment with innovation / homebrewing for convenient band

>>Ideally, the transverters would be dual frequency, so that you could 
>>tune to 432 terrestrial or 435 satellite; 1269 satellite or 1296 
>>terrestrial; and 2304 terrestrial or 2400 satellite.
>With the newest xvtrs using PLL in place of xtal oscillators; this is a 
>dc switch to shift LO's.  I am installing PLL's into my 1296 and 3400 
>DEMI xvtrs.

Yeah, I bought one for my 10368 MHz transverter, but haven't gotten around
to installing it in place of the MicroLO board. I even have a 10 MHz
rubidium standard to lock it onto the correct frequency. More projects than
time to work on them!

>>Newer DEMI transverters with the
>>synthesized LO board can be configured that way, at least on the 
>>higher bands. Then you'd have not only a kick-@$$ satellite system, 
>>but also an outstanding weak-signal terrestrial system.
>DEMI is planning for PLL from VHF up (when they can get to it).  PLL 
>available now 1296 and up.

That's good to know. I realized they were working down the bands in their
quest to redesign their transverters to all work with the PLL board. I
didn't know that they already had 1269/1296 and 2304/2400 PLL transverter
configurations ready.

>>Unfortunately, DEMI is once again revamping their lineup of products. 
>>Of course, this is good for us who want the latest and best, but bad 
>>for us who want something right NOW. Prices and specs are a little bit 
>>harder to obtain from DEMI right now, but I expect that the wait will be
worth it.
>Prices are announced on the webpage.  Some of the xvtrs are shipping in 
>June (I have 144/28 ordered).  They are shipping assembled units first, 
>then will offer kits later in the summer.

Per the web site:

No prices currently listed for 6M through 70cm bands. "in redevelopment"
No PLL models announced for 33cm and 23cm yet.
All models from 13cm and higher frequency now listed as PLL models with
pricing information.

You may have more information than I do on that. I pretty much stay chained
to my desk here in the sub-basement most of the day.,.

73 de W0JT
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list