[amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question
Alan P. Biddle
APBIDDLE at UNITED.NET
Tue Jun 1 00:57:48 PDT 2010
A good compromise, and I certainly understand the desire to remain in the
loop. It allows the other operator to take advantage of greater automation
or not, as suits them.
From: Greg D. [mailto:ko6th_greg at hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 11:37 PM
To: n3tl at bellsouth.net; apbiddle at mailaps.org; jbelstner at yahoo.com;
amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question
> From: n3tl at bellsouth.net
> To: APBIDDLE at mailaps.org; jbelstner at yahoo.com; amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:42:09 -0400
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question
> Alan, I have no doubt that you're right about the necessity for Doppler
> control above Mode B satellites. Having always preferred the KISS approach
> whenever possible, I suppose that's why I haven't been able to get myself
> very excited for L- and S-band opportunities. I definitely enjoy the
> benefits of computer control for Doppler. I just don't much care for
> no choice in using it (or not) to effectively work a satellite.
> 73 to all,
> Tim - N3TL
Actually, I've been running 2.4 ghz manually since AO-40, and really haven't
had that much trouble. Just keep spinning the dial. Also, having an older
rig (736r), I don't bother with computer control when on the linear birds.
I do relax under full computer control for FM up through L-band, but there's
still something satisfying about manual tuning.
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
inbox. See how.
More information about the AMSAT-BB