[amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
Gordon JC Pearce
gordonjcp at gjcp.net
Mon Aug 30 10:12:34 PDT 2010
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 09:32 -0400, Robert Bruninga wrote:
> > And isn't the idea that we are authorised to
> > experiment with these satellites, now that
> > the US Navy is no longer using them?
> Let me correct the record. We have no such authority.
Okay, then that *might* be different. I suspect you'd have to try
*really* hard to find anyone that would get upset at people listening to
your satellite without authority. It's impossible to get Ofcom
interested in stopping people transmitting without a licence or outside
the terms of their licence, and that's when they're jamming the local 2m
repeater that the Ofcom guys with amateur licenses frequent!
> We are simply looking at how one might use such a limited 500
> byte broadcast message capability IF-and-only-IF such access
> were somehow possible. That's why I like the idea of finding a
> use in disaster communications, where a proposal might have some
> Bob, Wb4APR
How hard would it be to develop a mobile/portable command station for
it? I know you said it used some very specific stuff to program, but
just how specific and difficult-to-reproduce would it be?
More information about the AMSAT-BB