[amsat-bb] Re: Arecibo on 432 MHz Moon Bounce (some calculations)
kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Thu Apr 22 08:46:33 PDT 2010
At 02:20 AM 4/22/2010, Stephen Melachrinos wrote:
>Ah, but this focuses on my question: Why is ERP referenced to a
>dipole? Why did someone assume that Arecibo's stated gain of 60 dB
>was dBd and not dBi? I've never seen the gain of a dish antenna used
>in satellite work quoted in dBd. All of the references for
>calculating gain are based on the isotropic reference. And all of
>the usages I have seen (in professional satellite work) use ERP and
>EiRP interchangeably, and the i in EiRP is used to explicitly state
>"referenced to isotropic."
>In fact, the amateur community is the only place where there is a
>fascination with the dipole reference.
>The dBd specs are useless for any real calculation purposes. Satcom
>engineering is much simpler if everyone quotes isotropic, and all
>commercial/government/military satellite link budgets are based on
>(Professional) Satcom Engineer since 1979
> > "ERP is about 243 MW" and
> > that comes from the conversion from dBi to dBd.
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
In fact the first gain number published over a month ago was 58
dBi. Then I suppose a bunch of hams complained that they didn't
understand isotropic gain so the Arecibo folks kindly converted the
number to 60 dBd. (i.e. unity isotropic gain, dBi=0, is what a true
omni-directional antenna produces in free space)
Does anyone on this reflector know the formula for calculating gain
of a parabolic dish (Yes, I know-I'm asking if you know)? Did you
know that Arecibo dish is spherical and not parabolic? So we can
only use the gain number they provide (BTW the UHF line-feed corrects
for spherical aberration of the dish surface at Arecibo). Arecibo
can track a small amount of angle "because" the dish is
spherical. It is my understanding (might be wrong on this) the
line-feed can adjust for the amount of surface irradiated (which will
change the gain).
The formula normally used in radio astronomy and mw engineering is in
terms of dBi. Most (not all) eme hams use dBi vs dBd.
I am really amazed at this thread on amsat-bb. I thought the
satellite community was more globally oriented (International). The
different convention in expressing decimal numbers (aka using comma
or period) is pretty well known (I thought). US/UK use period and
most EU use comma.
Most antenna analysis sw express gain in dBi
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-600w, 432-100w, 1296-60w, 3400-fall 2010
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa at hotmail.com
More information about the AMSAT-BB