[amsat-bb] Re: According to Rocky Jones
John B. Stephensen
kd6ozh at comcast.net
Sun Oct 18 15:54:37 PDT 2009
Your math seems to be off. Eagle disappeared due to lack of money to pay for
a launch rather than technical problems. This is much better than paying for
hardware to sit on the ground. Suitsat 2 and ARRISsat are the same thing so
there has been no failure yet.AO-51 is in orbit and working.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rocky Jones" <orbitjet at hotmail.com>
To: <nigel at ngunn.net>
Cc: "Amsat BB" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 15:49 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: According to Rocky Jones
>> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:44:57 +0000
>> From: nigel at ngunn.net
>> To: orbitjet at hotmail.com
>> CC: amsat-bb at amsat.org
>> Subject: According to Rocky Jones
>> I guesswe need to get you on the design/construction team to show the
>> "experts" how to do it.
> the experts were very successful with Suitsat 1. Eagle worked out good as
> well didnt it?
> Suitsat 2...dellivered on time ...oh well not so much. ARISSsat or
> whatever it is...fourth time is a charm
> Robert WB5MZO
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB