[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow Antennas - Horrible Performers
hamaa1vs at gmail.com
Sun Oct 4 04:45:40 PDT 2009
What do you have against the anritsu equipment I used to counter the
I found UHF to be about a half dB and VHF to be better than that and
when I checked the calibration it was within a tenth of a dB.
Clint Bradford wrote:
> >> ... from what I have read, a 2.65db loss of signal using Arrow's
> crappy duplexer ...
> Unless an Arrow Antenna performance report beings with, "My Motorola
> test equipment - certified within the last year - indicates ... [such-
> and-such performance characteristics] ... " - this that post is
> worthless to me.
> And should be worthless to anyone demanding the best-available
> And such mis-information shouldn't be passed on to anyone else. And
> messagegroup moderators should delete such undocumented tripe.
> Needless to say, I haven't read much of the recent "Arrow Performance"
> threads. Just aren't worth my time.
> Just my opinion, of course. I have been wrong.
> I couldn't ask for - nor imagine - better performance from my Arrow
> Antennas than what I am enjoying now. They prove themselves pass after
> pass, demo after demo ....
> Clint Bradford
> West coast curmudgeon
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB