[amsat-bb] Re: Evidence of moon landings....!
daleh at alaska.net
Mon Jul 20 15:42:51 PDT 2009
Jim Leder wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darin Cowan" <yet.another.squid at gmail.com>
> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:17 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Evidence of moon landings....!
>> Which is more reasonable:
>> 1. That a 40 year grand conspiracy involving literally thousands of people
>> from multiple, antagonistic countries, could pull off and maintain the
>> illusion that nobody has walked on the moon. Recognizing that the Soviet
>> Union and China both would have benefitted greatly for exposing such
>> and recognizing that the US government by itself - let alone all the other
>> people, organizations, and governments that have a stake in it - can't
>> even a little secret like "I went to Argentina to get a piece on the
>> Recognizing all the photographs, the rocks, the satellites, the orbiters,
>> the explosion of technology and so forth. Recognizing that the
>> in question have been unable, in the same time period, to keep their
>> from being shot at by simple lunatics, and that those governments haven't
>> even been able to construct a convincing lie about WMD in the middle-east:
>> something that really, everyone would believe with little effort?
>> 2. That men have actually been on the moon as reported?
>> The whole idea that the moon landings were faked is, quite simply,
>> weapons-grade stupid. It flies in the face of logic and reason. No
>> moon-conspiracy theorist has ever been able to produce a shred of evidence
>> that anything has been faked... a task that should be INCREDIBLY easy
>> the number of people that have to be involved to this day. Scientists, on
>> the other hand have produced photos, rocks, and mountains of other
>> not the least of which is the dozen people who have actually been there, a
>> good many of which are still walking around.
>> People who still tout this moon-landing-fake conspiracy are nutters, plain
>> and simple. There are many places I'd expect to find woo-woo conspiracy
>> believers, but never on the AMSAT list.
>> Can we please put this issue to bed and go back to satellites and radio
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
I for one wholeheartedly agree. Lets get on with real things,
satellites and radios.
Dale - kl7xj
More information about the AMSAT-BB