[amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?

Gary "Joe" Mayfield gary_mayfield at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 7 05:51:35 PST 2009

Sebastian makes a great point, and the other side of the coin is LOTW
contains all the information needed for Satellite VUCC.  One would hope it
will get added to the list soon.


-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Sebastian
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?

If you are chasing  VUCC - LoTW currently is not configured for VUCC.

I still upload those logs however, in hope that if they ever do  
configure it for VUCC, my data is there.

73 de W4AS

On Dec 31, 2008, at 12:51 AM, John W Lee wrote:

> Alan,
> There is no reason you can't upload to both E-QSL and LOTW.
> I send in my logs monthly to both.   E-QSL's really don't count for  
> any
> of the major awards.
> LOTW confirmations count for DXCC and WAS.
> 73,
> John K6YK
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:56:30 -0600 (CST) "Alan Sieg WB5RMG"
> <wb5rmg at somenet.net> writes:
>> I started using eQSL a year or so back, and have only recently seen
>> enough
>> action in my log to warrant uploading new contacts. I've been trying
>> to
>> go back thru old logs, and get caught up on returning some QSLs...
>> Seems what I'm hearing is that some do eQSL, some LOTW, others only
>> paper...
>> Reckon is there any harm in also doing LOTW ?     How many do both
>> ?
>> I'm sure that there are some that don't do either - no great loss I
>> guess.
>>   /;^)
>> -- 
>>  <- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list