[amsat-bb] Re: K5D an embarrassment / poor operating procedure.
yet.another.squid at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 14:40:15 PST 2009
Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:seanc at unixgeeks.ca] wrote:
>>Darin Cowan wrote:
>>> I'd be happy if people would just use the proper phonetic alphabet. So
>>> logs have been messed up by "kilowatt" which is KW to me, as opposed to
>>> correct "kilo" and the other bizarre appellations of letters.
>>> Combine proper phonetic use with "listen before transmitting" and 90% or
>>> better of the issues we see would go away.
>>I am often guilty of not using the correct phonetics, but I do have a
>>reason. 95% of the time, if the other station has marginal reception,
>>they come back as VE5, not VA5. I think it's just the other ops' brain
>>filling in the blanks with what they expect to hear, so I will correct
>>as "Victor America 5" and it usually seems to solve that problem. I do
>>try to stick with the ITU phonetics 99% of the time though.
VA and VE is a constant bugbear for me. My hearing is less than excellent,
to me VEE AY and VEE EEE sound essentially the same. I have to ask for
even on local repeaters. Some of the incorrect phonetics are more obvious
for A) but I've heard United Airlines (Is it UAL or UA?), Kilowatt (that's
someone with an electrical or physics background) and other perversions of
phonetic alphabet that - when combined with a local speaker's accent, make
I will always be Oscar India Juliet, never Old Injun Joe.
>>I would also add to that the following: If you can't hear the bird,
That's certainly wisdom to be followed.
73 de VE3OIJ
More information about the AMSAT-BB