[amsat-bb] Re: A0-51 "easy sat"
bbj at innismir.net
Mon Feb 25 14:20:47 PST 2008
Actually, on busy passes of AO-51, I find phonetics best because it is often quite hard to hear weaker stations over the "free for all" that can occur Not all stations are full quieting into the sat, nor does everyone always have a great signal on the receiving end. :)
Just my $0.02
Ben Jackson - N1WBV - bbj at innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net
>From my Cell Phone
From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu>
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Sent: 2/25/08 4:36 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: A0-51 "easy sat"
> How about trying to use the more preferred protocol of...
> Callsign phonetically. grid square, op mode
> Kilo-Six-Lima-Charlie-Sierra, Delta Mike 13, handheld
On FM, in my opinion, there is no need for phonetics except for
calls with troublesome letters. Most calls can be heard easily
without using up time with phonetics.
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB