[amsat-bb] Re: Fw: ELK or ARROW

Bob K0NR (email list) list at k0nr.com
Sun Dec 28 11:22:53 PST 2008

amsat-bb-request at amsat.org wrote:
> It seems improving the 2.4 dB of insertion loss of the diplexer would be a
> better strategy (although not necessarily easy in the space available) than
> attempting to modify what is very mechanically sound antenna.
> 73,
> Joe kk0sd

    I am surprised that the duplexer/diplexer (take your pick) has that
    much loss.
    Has anyone verified this via a direct measurement (such as via a
    network analyzer)?

    Bob K0NR

More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list