[amsat-bb] Re: Best HT's for sats?
mvandewettering at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 17:51:29 PST 2008
On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:
> I've made many sat contacts with my VX-2R but am
> thinking about upgrading to something with 5 watts
> output. I used a borrowed IC-W32A and Swan Island and
> it worked fine, although I could not hear my downlink
> in full duplex mode, too much desensing. Not sure
> full duplex is even worth the extra money, as it seems
> that most duplex HTs have a similar desensing problem.
> I was thinking about trading in the VX-2R for an FT-60
> or a VX-6R, any comments on these or other
> sat-friendly HTs?
> 73, Bill NZ5N
I've been using a TH-D7A and an Arrow antenna. Works
great, no problem with desense, and it's fun to use
the APRS stuff to bounce packets off ISS, Go-32 and NO-44.
It's not the most glamorous, but it works very well for
satellites, and I have no hesitation in recommending it
I find the full-duplex to be really useful. I put a
splitter on the sound output, and run half to some
cheap earbuds and the other to a voice recorder. That
way, I can record both my voice and others without
difficulty. Scan back through my blog @ http://brainwagon.org
for example mp3s.
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of
> Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB