[amsat-bb] Re: ISS a Satellite or an airplane?
kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Sun Sep 16 04:28:07 PDT 2007
At 10:11 AM 9/15/2007, Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR] wrote:
>We have this sort of discussion every year before field day. ARRL
>permits contacts VIA the ISS for credit as a satellite but does not
>count contacts TO the ISS crew for credit (though many are made just for fun).
>Since the ISS is a unique situation (currently being the only manned
>satellite with amateur radio gear), the ARRL has some conflicting
>rules to deal with. It is a satellite so contacts via it should be
>legitimate. It is a manned craft not in contact with the Earth so it
>does not count for contacts just like an aeronautical mobile contact
>does not count.
>I personally do not think having the ISS declared a DXCC entity is a
>good idea. The crew would be overwhelmed when on and the ISS is not
>a permanent installation.
>On the other hand, what do you think the ARRL will do with manned
>amateur radio locations on the moon?
>Kenneth - N5VHO
In my opinion astronaut contacts at ISS should be regarded as
satellite contacts. But then ISS and shuttle contacts are so unique
they deserve their own recognition and a QSL from them is certainly
one. I suppose a WWAS (worked all space shuttles) or WAA (worked all
astronauts) might be considered? But we already had a space-race so
do not need to repeat that with ham contacts :-)
Regarding Moon contacts I would suppose the Moon would be set up with
grids like earth, so each grid would suffice (exploration of the
lunar landscape will probably dictate some demarcation scheme). I
would guess that off-world radio contacts would not be included into
the DXCC for the same reason as ISS. But as the Moon and planets are
populated an ETDXCC would evolve. Of course this already exists as
an award from the SETI-League.
Ed - KL7UW
BP40IQ 50-MHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
144-EME: FT-847, mgf-1801, 4x-xpol-20, 185w
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa at hotmail.com
More information about the AMSAT-BB