[amsat-bb] Re: The Whole GEO Package - EMCOMM
k0vty at juno.com
Thu Dec 20 11:44:57 PST 2007
I understand Roger.
Since Katrina there has been reported activity by ARRL and Home Land
that tend to reach for the GEO type capability
Without the AMSAT ability I might add.
At this stage it is all conjecture which hopes to not miss anything.
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:35:18 -0500 "Roger Kolakowski" <rogerkola at aol.com>
> Joe noted...
> "...> The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's
> emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago....<
> Please don't misinterpret me...It has been mentioned many times that
> does not necessarily have Satellite interests as one of their
> The status of contesting through satellites is one example.
> I mentioned ARRL only in recognition of past efforts and
> accomplishments in
> supporting EMCOMM...a decision would have to be made as to whether
> they have
> expertise or influence remaining in that area, other than an
> existing large
> organization of amateur radio operators. Do we as AMSAT need to
> that pool of talent or do we choose to "borrow" from it to meet
> EMCOMM goals?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k0vty at juno.com>
> To: <rogerkola at aol.com>
> Cc: <brobertson at mta.ca>; <amsat-bb at amsat.org>;
> <kl7uw at acsalaska.net>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: The Whole GEO Package - EMCOMM
> > The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's
> > for emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago.
> > At least it would appear the issue is larger than just AMSAT-NA
> > Joe K0VTY
> > ==================
More information about the AMSAT-BB