[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle
nss at mwt.net
Sat Dec 15 09:29:40 PST 2007
My thoughts exactly.
Like this was a similar case when a local ARES/RACES group was placing
a LOT of their traffic handling on WINLINK. i told them when it all
dies how are they supposed to pass traffic.
We need to be the key word, "Off the Grid" in every way
sco at sco-inc.com wrote:
>Sprint would be down too in a Katrina situation or if the terrorists
>set off a nuclear device in Atlanta the commo in the Southeast might
>be down. How can Sprint offer the same coverage area as Hams? How
>would Sprint tie into military and civil defense commo? The "wide
>area" must be assumed to be at least a whole state or region. If all
>normal commo in the Southeastern US goes down and you are in that
>area how far can your cell phone go to a Sprint site? Assume the
>nearest working site is at least 500 miles from you? How does Sprint
>handle that? How do you keep the "public" out so you can handle
>emergency traffic, on Sprint? With a GEO sat we could provide commo
>in the whole lower 48 (states). How does Sprint compare to that capability?
>At 06:04 PM 12/13/2007, you wrote:
>>Forget the EMCOMM support, that does not make sense anymore. Read on...
>>WIMAX will be available from sprint soon. THAT will be a reliable
>>technology for ecom. With one access point, they will cover a wide
>>area for both data and voice. NOW, imagine multiple access point
>>( and I mean 2 or 3 max) and regardless of what the ecom situation
>>is, help will get through.
>>We have to understand here that P4 satcom for ecom is not a selling
>>On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
>>>What many of us have been trying to say is there are NO free rides
>>>to GTO. The business has changed in that respect. The P4 proposal
>>>opens the door to possible govermental EMCOMM funding, as well as
>>>bringing in a whole new base of support.
>>>73, Drew KO4MA
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB