[amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
ve4yz at mts.net
Sun Sep 10 14:19:41 PDT 2006
Here is the colored PDF chart of Emily's previous link. Zoom in on the PDF
in the 2300-2305 ( about 150% on my Acrobat reader )to see closely what
Emily is referring to.
|From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org
|[mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Emily Clarke
|Sent: September 10, 2006 1:32 PM
|To: John B. Stephensen; amsat-bb at amsat.org
|Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
|At 11:59 PM 9/9/2006, John B. Stephensen wrote:
|>Unfortunately, there is no country that allows the use of 2.3 GHz for
|>amateur satellites and only one country in the footprint of the
|>satellite would have to object.
|The detailed chart (
|http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/Chp04Chart.pdf - starting on page
|50) is a bit fuzzy but it looks like amateur is allocated from
|2300 - 2450, albeit all on a secondary basis. Currently there
|is a 5MHz amateur allocation at 2300-2305 in all three regions
|and a 10MHz allocation at 2390 - 2400. I believe the
|2390-2400 is primary as it appears in all caps and 2300-2305
|may also be primary.
|This doesn't mean these are available for satellite use. The
|only bandplan I have found for this spectrum comes from the
|But it is a bandplan, and bandplans are subject to change.
|For example, there is 800 KHz allocated between 2303.0 to
|2303.8 and another 500 KHz between 2399.0 and 2399.5 for low
|rate packet. Can the use of that part of the bandplan be
|negotiated? I don't know. However I will be very interested
|in hearing Paul Renaldo's presentation in San Francisco and
|meeting with the other members of the IARU.
|Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of
|Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
|Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB