[amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
rogerkola at aol.com
Sun Sep 10 18:06:07 PDT 2006
That folder does not contain that file...maybe it's another filename?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Thoren" <alan.thoren at mts.net>
To: "'Emily Clarke'" <emily at clarke-design.com>; "'John B. Stephensen'"
<kd6ozh at comcast.net>; <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 5:11 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
> Here's a colour ( or color ) coded Radio Spectrum Allocation chart in PDF
> format of a 2'x3' poster that just about every Canadian amateur has posted
> in their shack.
> The olive color is amateur and the olive with dots is amateur shared.
> |The detailed chart (
> |http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/Chp04Chart.pdf - starting on page
> |50) is a bit fuzzy but it looks like amateur is allocated from 2300 -
> albeit all on a secondary basis. Currently |there is a 5MHz amateur
> allocation at 2300-2305 in all three regions and a 10MHz allocation at
> - 2400. I believe |the 2390-2400 is primary as it appears in all caps and
> 2300-2305 may also be primary.
> |This doesn't mean these are available for satellite use. The only
> I have found for this spectrum comes from the |ARRL website.
> |But it is a bandplan, and bandplans are subject to change. For example,
> there is 800 KHz allocated between 2303.0 to
> |2303.8 and another 500 KHz between 2399.0 and 2399.5 for low rate packet.
> Can the use of that part of the bandplan be |negotiated? I don't know.
> However I will be very interested in hearing Paul Renaldo's presentation
> San Francisco and |meeting with the other members of the IARU.
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB