[amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E
sv1bsx at yahoo.gr
Thu Sep 7 15:10:47 PDT 2006
I agree also. In addition, don't forget a great benefit of S-band downlink:
the antenna is just a TVRO dish + a patch (or small helix), with great
I remember the good old days of AO-40, it was possible to access the
just by using a small 10 el. Yagi for Uplink and a small Dish for
The "monster" VHF-UHF crossed Yagi antennas for AO-10 & 13 always was a
reason to discourage me from these birds.
In contrast, the simplicity of AO-40-gear was very attractive for me and I
believe for many other Hams. No Crossed-Yagis, no LNAs, no Coaxial relays
etc... Just a Dish, a feeder, a Downconverter and several meters of cheap
coaxial cable up to the shack!
I think is wrong to exclude this band from Eagle even the WiFi is
grow-up... in any case we have already the S-band equipments and I don't
remember an easier way to receive a Satellite.
73, Mak SV1BSX
sv1bsx at yahoo.gr
LAN eMail-Server: This Email has been checked by NAV 2005
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner at mindspring.com>
To: "Rick Fletcher" <rfletcher at plumdragon.com>; "'AMSAT'"
<amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:38 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E
> I am in _TOTAL_ agreement. I live in the suburbs of Tampa/St. Pete and
> had an interference problem on my 3 foot dish. I have used the same dish
> log well over a dozen WiFi access points in that immediate neighborhood.
> With properly designed equipment, all that trash on 2.4 ghz goes away with
> some elevation. What won't work is helixes with multiple sidelobes, and
> surplus dishes that let one whole polarity of noise right thru the back.
> Everyone knows I'm a big supporter of AMSAT, but I gotta call it as I see
> it. It makes me think of "bait and switch" to collect money for a project
> featuring such a popular mode and then drop it.
> The loss of Mode B on AO-40 caused a lot of the hardcore AO-10/AO-13 types
> to walk away, and that was tough to overcome. Now that we have, and we
> people wanting S band, we leave them behind too. Even if it's a sound
> engineering decision (and that hasn't been proven to me) it's a horrid
> marketing decision. Bad mojo for a organization that lives on the
> of it's members.
> Sorry if this causes any pain to those involved with Eagle, but I needed
> get it off my chest.
> 73, Drew KO4MA
> AMSAT LM 2332
> >While AO-40 was still alive and I was working it from deep within
> >Valley", an area blanketed by WiFi, 2.4GHz cordless phones, etc., I
> >discovered that a parabolic dish with a properly positioned and designed
> >patch feed (slightly under-illuminating the dish and having no
> >side-lobes) would bring in AO-40's S-band downlink very nicely and
> >Of course, other feed or antenna types such as helical antennas/feeds
> >useless in that environment.
> >I have to admit that I don't buy the "too noisy" argument.
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
ÂáñåèÞêáôå ôá åíï÷ëçôéêÜ ìçíýìáôá (spam); Ôï Yahoo! Mail äéáèÝôåé ôçí êáëýôåñç äõíáôÞ ðñïóôáóßá êáôÜ ôùí åíï÷ëçôéêþí ìçíõìÜôùí
More information about the AMSAT-BB