[amsat-bb] Fwd: Re: S band interference solution
wy0x at mac.com
Thu Oct 5 11:37:14 PDT 2006
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Nate Duehr <nate at natetech.com>
> Date: October 5, 2006 12:36:38 PM MDT
> To: k8ocl at arrl.net
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: S band interference solution
> On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:40 AM, John Champa wrote:
>> I am happy to report that I get along with my neighbors very well,
>> thank you,
>> so none of these TVI-type suggestions were any problem whatsoever
>> at this QTH.
>> Have you ever read any texts from the ARRL, etc. on how to manage
>> a TVI problem?
>> They are not as popular as they once were, but you can still find
>> them around.
>> They will help you in the social skills areas, another big weak
>> point for most Hams.
>> 73, John
> You completely misread my comments. I do just fine with social
> skills and know the neighbors.
> What I *don't* want is to become the neighbor's "tech support" guy
> by having a conversation with them about 2.4 interference or
> "helping" them with their router. They don't know I can fix their
> routers, computers, whatever... and I'd pretty much like to keep it
> that way.
> I didn't make any TVI suggestions at all. Not sure where you got
> that from.
> I was just (humorously) pointing out that:
> Being forced to deal with interference that's built-into the band-
> plan given us by the FCC if 2.4 is flown brings added complexity
> and time necessary that many hams will simply avoid. Not because
> the technical details of hunting down low-power interference
> sources is difficult, but because you have to go pester the
> neighbors, ultimately leading to a number of other complex problems
> completely unrelated to ham radio.
> For someone who just wants to get on and operate, finding out they
> have to first hunt down local interference in the neighborhood will
> simply mean they don't operate at all.
> I'm not the "just want to operate" type, but I certainly don't want
> to involve myself in the nightmare that is known as my neighbor's
> home computers. I do computers and networking and
> telecommunications for a living -- fixing someone's (permanently)
> broken Windows box, isn't my idea of fun, interesting, or even
> slightly amusing anymore. Unless someone wants to pay me my usual
> overtime rate for it.
> Walking next door to futz with the neighbor's 802.11 devices opens
> me up to that.
> Currently I can "hear" six 802.11 devices from my back porch in a
> suburban area without a gain antenna, using the built-in antenna on
> my laptop. And those are the ones that are broadcasting an SSID,
> and of course this doesn't include cordless phones. 900 MHz ham
> is similarly trashed by various unlicensed "household electronic
> stuff" I'm not going to bother hunting down.
> It's not getting any better where I live, and I'm in Denver. And
> in places where housing is more compact... it must be far worse by
> Nate WY0X
> Nate Duehr
> nate at natetech.com
wy0x at mac.com
More information about the AMSAT-BB